Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

There is little in-depth research that can assist designers to use culture as a catalyst for designing innovative products within Botswana’s context. The concept of culture and design are intertwined, thus modifications stemming from cultural evolution both reflect and determine developments in design. The paper discusses an experimental design approach conducted at the University of Botswana and participants challenge was to transform and encode socio-cultural factors into product design features. The paper concludes by discussing a model which has shown one way concerning how to consciously specify, analyse and integrate socio-cultural factors in the design process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • A Framework for a Long Term Vision for Botswana-2016. (1996). Presidential task group for a long term vision for Botswana. Gaborone: Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akin, O., & Lin, C. (1996). Design protocol data and novel design decisions. In N. Cross, H. Christiaan, & K. Dorst (Eds.), Analysing design activity. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aula, P., Pekkala, J., & Romppainen, J. (2003). Modeling the socio-cultural context. ACM. Retrieved July 8, 2005, from http://www.urova.fi/mode/dppi03.pdf.

  • Aykin, N. (Ed.). (2005). Usability and internationalization of information technology. New York, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A. (2001). Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carley, K. (1990). Content analysis. In R. E. Asher (Ed.), The encyclopaedia of language and linguistics. Pergamon Press: Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, J. (2005). Emotionally durable design: Objects, experiences and empathy. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chong, M. (2004). Designing the user experience for international web users. In M. Kaplan (Ed.), Cultural ergonomics. Elsevier: Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, N., Christiaan, H., & Dorst, K. (1996). The delft protocol workshop. In N. Cross, H. Christiaan & K. Dorst (Eds.), Analysing design activity. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delaney, M., McFarland, J., Yoon, G. H., & Hardy, T. (2002). Global localisation, innovation—global design and cultural identity. Innovation, Summer, 46–49.

  • DeLarge, C. A. (2004). Storytelling as a critical success factor in design processes and outcomes. Design Management, 15(3), 16–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Souza, M., & Dejean, P. H. (1999, April). Interculturality and design: Is culture a block or encouragement to innovation? In Paper presented at the Design Cultures—An International Conference of Design Research, Sheffield Hallam.

  • Dorst, K. (1996). The design problem and its structure. In N. Cross, H. Christiaan & K. Dorst (Eds.), Analysing design activity. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes, T. (1995). Global interface design. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaver, W. (2001). Cultural probes—probing people for design inspiration. Interaction, 8(5), 51–57. doi:10.1145/382899.382907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hugo, J. (2002, February). HCI and multiculturalism in Southern Africa. In Paper Presented at the Design Education Conference, Cape Town.

  • ICSID. (2002). Facts about ICSID. Retrieved November 1, 2004, from http://www.icsid.org/.

  • Jason, H. (1997). Patterns in oral literature. Hague: Mouton Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, M. (2004). Introduction: Adding a cultural dimension to human factors. In M. Kaplan (Ed.), Cultural ergonomics. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaptelinin, V. (1996). Computer mediated activity: Functional organs in social and developmental context. In B. A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kersten, G. E., Matwin, S., Noronha, S. J., & Kersten, M. A. (2000). The software for cultures and the cultures in software. In H. R. Hansen, M. Bichler, & H. Harald (Eds.), Paper Presented at the 8th European Conference on Information Systems, Vienna, pp. 509–514.

  • Kotro, T., & Pantzar, M. (2002). Product development and changing cultural landscapes—is our future in “snowboarding”. Design Issues, 18(2), 30–45. doi:10.1162/074793602317355765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, K. (2006). The semantic turn: A new foundation for design. London: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuutti, K. (1999). Activity theory as a potential framework for human–computer interaction research. In B. A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. P. (2004, November). Design methods for cross-cultural collaborative design project. In Paper Presented at the Design Research Society International Conference: Futureground, Melbourne.

  • Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2001). Practical research planning and design. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manzini, S., & Susani, M. (Eds.). (1995). The solid side. Eindhoven: V+K Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzano, S. (2000). New values for the new millennium Philips Corporate Design. Eindhoven: V+K Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, E. (2002). Face-to-face storytelling. New Delhi: Tamil Nadu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moalosi, R., Popovic, V., Hickling-Hudson, A., & Kumar, K. L. (2005). Integrating culture within Botswana product design. In Paper Presented at the International Design Congress, Yunlin.

  • National Policy on Culture. (2002). Ministry of Labour and Home Affairs. Gaborone: Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. A. (2004). Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onibere, E. A., Morgan, S., & Mpoeleng, D. (2001). Human-computer interface design issues for a multi-cultural and multi-lingual English speaking country—Botswana. Interacting with Computers, 13, 497–512. doi:10.1016/S0953-5438(00)00052-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ono, M. M. (2002). Emergent strategies for designing new products facing cultural diversity, within the globalisation context. In Paper Presented at the 2nd Conference on Innovative Research in Management, Stockholm.

  • Papanek, V. (1984). Design for the real world—human ecology and social change. London: Thames and Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popovic, V. (1996). Design activity structural categories. In N. Cross, H. Christiaan, & K. Dorst (Eds.), Analysing design activity. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popovic, V. (2002). Activity and designing pleasurable interaction with everyday artifacts. In P. W. Jordan & W. S. Green (Eds.), Pleasure with products: Beyond usability (pp. 367–376). London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Press, M., & Cooper, R. (2003). The design experience: The role of design and designers in the twenty-first century. Burlington: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinharz, S. (1992). Feminist methods in social research. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Röse, K. (2004). The development of culture-orientated human machine system: Specification, analysis and integration of relevant intercultural variables. In M. Kaplan (Ed.), Cultural Ergonomics. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saha, A. (1998). Technological innovation and Western values. Technology in Society, 20, 499–520. doi:10.1016/S0160-791X(98)00030-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. (1999). The corporate culture survival guide. San Francisco: Bass Jossey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, D. (2001). Interpreting qualitative data methods for analysing talk, text and interaction. London: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, A. J., Roberts, P. H., & Hall, M. J. D. (1999). Understanding person-product relationships–A design perspective. In W. S. Green & P. W. Jordan (Eds.), Human factors in product design. London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyan-Yu, W., Chi-Hsien, H., & RungTai, L. (2004). The study of Taiwan aboriginal culture on product design. In Paper Presented at the Design Research Society International Conference: Futureground, Melbourne.

  • Van Raaij, F. W. (2005). Applied consumer behaviour. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis. London: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, X. Y. (2003) Culture—trends for contemporary design in the 21st century. In Paper Presented at the 6th Asian Design Conference. Retrieved August 21, 2005, from http://www.idemployee.id.tue.nl/g.w.rauterberg/conference/CD_doNotOpen/ADC/program.html.

  • Zec, P. (2002). Lifestyle and product culture for a global age: Good design. Innovation, Summer, 34–38.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richie Moalosi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moalosi, R., Popovic, V. & Hickling-Hudson, A. Culture-orientated product design. Int J Technol Des Educ 20, 175–190 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-008-9069-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-008-9069-1

Keywords

Navigation