Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rendering Diversion #149

Closed
jeffkaufman opened this issue Mar 16, 2021 · 1 comment
Closed

Rendering Diversion #149

jeffkaufman opened this issue Mar 16, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@jeffkaufman
Copy link
Contributor

jeffkaufman commented Mar 16, 2021

In developing new creative formats and tweaking existing creatives, it is common to run rendering experiments. Should the text go here, or here? Should the text be bold? What should be the shape of the button? We are interested in running these experiments in response to rendering_url requests.

The browser would request the HTML (or, eventually, Web Bundle) for an ad, and the server would return a fully rendered ad. Each ad is the product of many, perhaps 30, experiment decisions. For example, users might be randomly assigned to either a "bold text" experiment group (id=12345) or a "no change" control group (id=67890). We're imagining the server could return the IDs for each treatment group it applied in its response.

Once the ad rendered in the browser, it could pass the treatment ids to the reporting worklet which could, with event level reporting, be logged along with other information the worklet has. After the transition to aggregate reporting, the reporting worklet could send separate pings for each treatment group.

This relies on some mechanism for the creative rendering in a fenced frame to pass information to the reporting worklet. Does that sound like something FLEDGE could support?

@JensenPaul
Copy link
Collaborator

Closing as I believe this is supported in via the eventData field of the Fenced Frame Ad Reporting API.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants